Presiding Judge of a nine member bench, Justice Park Han-Chul said"even if adultery should be condemned as immoral, state power should not intervene in individual's private life".
The nine member bench ruled the by 7 to 2 that the 1953 law was unconstitutional.
On the other hand, Justice Ann Chang-Ho who read the dissenting option at the constitutional court said that the Statute was a ket protector of family morals, and warned that it's abolition would spark a surge in debauchery.
with nearly 900 in 2014, 216 in 2004, 42 by 2008, they claimed that adultery can be condemned as immoral but not as a criminal act.
Recently, it's very rare for a person to serve a prison term for adultry.the number of indictment has decreased as charges are usually dropped said Lim Ji-Bong, a law professor from Sogang University Seoul.

No comments:
Post a Comment